What a Defensible ARV Actually Looks Like

A number you can hand a lender is different from a number you talked yourself into. Here's the difference, and why it decides whether the deal funds.

By Ashlee Croft

Most investors do not have an ARV problem. They have a defensibility problem. The number is fine right up until someone with money asks how you got it.

The three tests

A defensible ARV survives three questions from a lender, a partner, or an appraiser:

  1. Would an appraiser pull these same comps? Same subdivision or a competing one, similar square footage, similar lot, similar vintage, closed inside six months.
  2. Are the adjustments written down? A comp that is 300 feet larger and has a pool is not the same house. If you cannot show the adjustment math, you do not have an ARV, you have a hope.
  3. Does it hold if the best comp disappears? Pull the top comp out. If the number moves more than a few percent, it was carried by one sale, and one sale is not a market.

Where the number usually breaks

  • Comping to list price instead of closed price. Active listings tell you what sellers want, not what buyers paid.
  • Ignoring condition. A flipped comp with a new kitchen is only your comp if your scope includes a new kitchen.
  • Stretching the radius. Every quarter mile you add is a school boundary, a flood zone, or a different buyer.
  • Rounding up. A $412,000 supported value becomes "call it 425" and the whole deal is now built on $13,000 that does not exist.

What we deliver

Every ANALYST engagement includes the comp set, the adjustments, the supported value, and the walk-away number — in a PDF you can hand to a lender without editing it first.

That last part matters. If you have to rewrite the analysis before showing it to money, it was not an analysis.

Back to all posts


Bring us the deal.

Under contract, in negotiation, or still just a warm lead — start with a forty-five minute discovery call and leave knowing whether it's worth doing and how to build it.